The Untouchables (1987) with Kevin Costner

untouchables 1987

“You wanna know how to get Capone? They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way!   And that’s how you get Capone.”-Sean Connery to Kevin Costner

Sean Connery.  Kevin Costner.  Brian De Palma.  Ennio Morricone.  Could it be possible that each of these artists—two actors, a director and a film composer—did their best work in The Untouchables?  It’s possible.  Not likely. Still——

The opportunity to judge for yourself is now at hand in some bang-up new Blu-ray releases from Warner Bros., officially available May 21, two volumes in the “Ultimate Gangster Collection.”  One set, the “Classic Collection,” represents, some might say, the cream of black-and-white in this genre, from 1931 to 1949, climaxed by James Cagney’s White Heat.  The other set which includes three other films, The Petrified Forest, Little Caesar and The Public Enemy arrives under the “Contemporaty” moniker.  Both are available on Blu-ray 5/21. Thanks to Warner Brothers for the review copy provided.

The second set, the “Contemporary Collection,” is just as “creamy,” albeit much, much bloodier, thanks to the vivid color and the immense “progress” made in the name of realism.  These five gangster movies were made between 1973 and 1995.  In order of creation, they are Mean Streets,The Untouchables, GoodFellas, Heat and The Departed.  Were it not that all but two of the films are directed by Martin Scorsese and all but one stars Robert De Niro, this could be regarded as a first-rate tribute to these two men.  Rather than to any individuals, this set is a first-class tribute to the gangster films of this later period of Hollywood history.

The great wonder of both DVD sets is not, as is usually the case, that the buyer, to use an appropriate metaphor, inherits a dubious gun case with only one or two loaded guns.  Congratulations to Warner Bros.!  There are no blanks in either of these sets.  All are at least three-star films, most of them four, four being tops.

As to that question regarding the convergence of such outstanding talent in The Untouchables, the movie which is the specific interest here, Sean Connery, Brian De Palma and Ennio Morricone were never better.  Oscars are sometimes ill-placed, and governed by all sorts of non-acting criteria, but Connery’s Best Supporting Actor award is clearly deserved, even if it were a belated award for accumulative work, which fortunately it is not.  That that category was not especially strong in 1987 should not diminish his Oscar.  The acting is, indeed, the best of his career.

Kevin Costner was in the middle of his ripest period, with the luck to fall into a cluster of good films, making each role his own.  His success had officially begun a few years earlier, in 1985, with Silverado. The Untouchables was immediately followed by No Way Out—a slick thriller, however preposterous the about-face ending—and then, often one after the other, such right-on targets as Bill Durham, Field of Dreams, Dances with Wolves, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, JFK and Wyatt Earp

the-untouchables-kevin-costnerDespite the sometimes lack of the most nuanced of performances, his acceptance from the first has been largely due to his wholesome, boyish appearance and likable personality, a kind of James Stewart successor. Like Stewart, he mostly plays, and is most comfortable as, an easy-going good guy, one of the few exceptions being the serial killer role in Mr. Brooks.

Not that The Untouchables contains Costner’s greatest performance.  It doesn’t.  The competition, too, is rather tight.  He is obviously out shown by Connery, an indomitable presence and a born scene-stealer in any case.  Even Charles Martin Smith holds his own and gains sympathy as another nice “good guy,” so much so that the seasoned filmgoer will instinctively sense, “Yep, he’s gonna die before this flick is over.”

Robert-DeNiro_UntouchablesAs for Robert De Niro, his always larger-than-life acting well suits this larger-than-life movie.  He is variously gripping as the evil Al Capone, from violently malicious when his power is threatened to tearfully sentimental during a performance of “Vesti la giubba” from Pagliacci.  His method acting seems to pay off remarkably well here—critics must not be against “the method” when it works!—especially during the “baseball bat” luncheon and his staircase confrontation with Ness, this Federal agent nemesis: “I want him DEAD!  I want his family DEAD!  I want his house burned to the GROUND!”  Since De Niro never has a scene with Connery, the one actor in this flick strong enough to challenge him, the results of that comparison must remain forever inconclusive.  For me, however, it’s the Scotsman all the way.

[click to continue…]

{ 2 comments }

Mirage (1965) with Gregory Peck

1965 mirage

“If you’re not committed to anything, you’re just taking up space.”— Gregory Peck to Kevin McCarthy in the climax of Mirage

Should a latecomer arrive after the main title credits of Mirage, he might easily think he is watching a Hitchcock suspenser, the film is that good in doing what it sets out to do. The main theme of the movie, amnesia, is what haunts the same actor, Gregory Peck, in Hitch’s Spellbound. Walter Abel’s fall from a high office building recalls Norman Lloyd’s plunge from the Statue of Liberty in Hitch’s Saboteur, and any number of the director’s films, either fatal falls or otherwise—in Blackmail, Shadow of a Doubt, Rear Window, Vertigo, North by Northwest and many others.


Peck as the innocent man-on-the-run is, in fact, Hitch’s most recurring theme—in The 39 Steps, Saboteur, Shadow of a Doubt (not so innocent here!), Strangers on a Train, The Man Who Knew Too Much (both versions) and epitomized in North by Northwest. Diane Baker, the desirable, enigmatic woman who haunts Peck’s every step, though not here the director’s preferred blond, evokes any number of Hitch actresses and their wiles on screen. Baker, never quite convincing as a femme fatale, here suggests a cross between a concerned sister and an instructor, frightened herself, on how Peck can stay alive.

Certainly stairs occur in Mirage, though only secondarily, conceivably a metaphor for a loss of sanity—well, memory, anyway. Hitch’s staircases—in Rebecca, Saboteur, Suspicion, Shadow of a Doubt, Notorious, The Paradine Case, The Man Who Knew Too Much, Psycho and so many others—represent a character’s confusion, malice, vulnerability, almost always a change in fortune.

1963 charadeThere are two strong, more specific similarities in Mirage with another, if not a Hitchcock film, then a Hitch-like one, Charade, directed by Stanley Donen a few years before Mirage. In Mirage, a man is bludgeoned with the butt of a pistol and tossed in a bathtub; the counterpart in Charade, where George Kennedy, also another nasty character in Mirage, is drowned in one. In another parallel, a detective in Mirage and a phony CIA man in Charade both occupy an office “while the secretary is out to lunch.” The actor in both cases is Walter Matthau.

These similarities shouldn’t be surprising. Peter Stone, who scripted Charade, also wrote the screenplay for Mirage, based on the novel by Howard Fast, pseudonym in the credits for Walter Ericson. Mirage is directed by veteran Edward Dmytryk, a director of such diverse films as Hitler’s Children, Murder, My Sweet, The Caine Mutiny and Raintree County.

mirage 1965 4Despite an absence of the requisite shadowy lighting and a less than dark score by Quincy Jones, Mirage could, in one strong aspect, pass for a film noir. Peck is certainly in a “noir” situation, that is, his life is at stake, and he is pursued by numerous unsavory characters. A whole gang, in fact, is out to get him. Exactly why he is a target is the key to the film’s suspense, and considerable suspense there is. And related to this, what Hitchcock would call the “MacGuffin,” what is it that everybody is after? Further connected, what is it Peck can’t remember? He doesn’t know, he says. Or does he? . . .

And if the people after him are the cause of his dilemma, just as many others are unsympathetic to his plight—a bartender, a doorman, a desk sergeant and, most insensitive, a psychiatrist. Even this woman, played by Baker, seems basically indifferent and, yes, that word again, “shady.” She is the unknown factor in it all. She seems to be on both sides, for and against the man she seems to be following.

But the audience might change its mind about Baker when another quality emerges during a little girl’s (Eileen Baral) tea party. Only the drink is coffee, the “coffee” poured from an empty pot by the child who is home alone, re-enacting a grownup’s life. Baker’s character reveals a tender interaction with the little girl—a sign she would make a good wife?—and when Peck reaches in his pocket to shell out a tip, she suggests that a simple “thank you” is all that is necessary.

And after giving up trying to explain to an insensitive policeman and an arrogant psychiatrist that someone is trying to kill him, the one stranger who becomes a friend, a laid-back private detective he hires, ends up murdered, making Peck as much alone as he was at the start of his nightmare.

But to begin . . . at the beginning, here is a highly condensed synopsis:

Mirage opens in the dark, on the twenty-seventh floor of an office tower in New York City. The first Hitchcock film that comes to mind that so opens is Suspicion, Cary Grant and Joan Fontaine’s train coming out of a tunnel. David Stillwell (Peck), a cost accountant, or so he says, meets Shela (Baker) in a stairwell during a power outage. That she remembers him and he not her, that she speaks of an unknown “Major,” are the first clues that something is amiss with his memory, possibly his mind.

mirage 1965 2Leaving the building, he walks past a man, dead on the sidewalk, who has fallen from one of the high office windows, and on a subway ride he reads the headline on a commuter’s newspaper that the victim was Charles Calvin (Abel), a famous humanitarian. (My, that news was reported, printed and distributed almost instantaneously, even for a time when late editions were common!)

At his apartment, Stillwell is confronted by a congenial, talkative man with a gun, Lester (Jack Weston), who says “the Major” wants to see him. Stillwell subdues the intruder, but, alarmingly, finds that his refrigerator and briefcase are empty. He receives a phone call from Josephson (Kevin McCarthy), referring to some trip to Barbados; moments before, Stillwell had tried unsuccessfully to call Josephson, using an area code that had been changed two years ago.

mirage 1965 3Fearful for his life, Stillwell consults a desk sergeant (Hari Rhodes) who trivializes the idea that someone is trying to kill him. “Forget it!” Stillwell says. Next, from a skeptical psychiatrist (Robert H. Harris) he learns that the two-year memory loss he describes, which suggests unconscious amnesia, can last no more than two days, at the most. “To hell with you, doctor!”

Stillwell next resorts to a private detective, Ted Caselle (Matthau). Turns out, he has no secretary (the one “out to lunch”), no partner and this is his first case. “Terrific!” Caselle suggests they retrace his client’s steps. At Stillwell’s apartment, the refrigerator is now stuffed with food, the briefcase full of papers and Lester’s hat and gun Stillwell had put in the closet—gone.

The entry door to his supposed office, Garrison Limited, is now a solid wall. And descending to the lowest level of the building, the two men find that the subbasements Stillwell had seen before have vanished. While there, they are attacked by, but are able to subdue, a “maintenance man” (Kennedy as Willard). In the lobby, Stillwell discovers that doorman Joe Turtle (Neil Fitzgerald) is now someone else.

In a lead provided by Shela, who turns up frequently in Stillwell’s nightmare, he discovers Turtle in his apartment all right—in the bathtub, his head bashed in. And returning to Caselle’s office, Stillwell finds the detective strangled with the telephone cord.

Mirage 1965 1In the film’s climax, this helpless and bewildered man-on-the-run confronts his adversaries—Josephson, Willard and the seemingly fence-straddling Shela (Lester has been killed by Willard). He meets, finally, “the Major,” actual name Crawford (Leif Erickson), a retired Army officer and Calvin’s deputy.

Having reclaimed bits of memory earlier, Stillwell now fits together the final pieces of his identify and past, even as Willard is slugging him. He is not a cost accountant, but a physical chemist, and what Crawford has been after is his formula for neutralizing atomic bomb radiation, to make a “safe” bomb. And Calvin’s death? Stillwell was burning the only existing copy of the formula when Calvin grabbed for it and fell out the window. (Speaking of movie similarities, Abel’s earlier speech about the “little ants” below on the pavement recalls Orson Welles’ to Joseph Cotton on the Ferris wheel in Citizen Kane.) Calvin’s fall, then, generated Stillwell’s amnesia—and his subsequent guilt that he was responsible for the death.

In a game of Russian roulette, Crawford tries to persuade Stillwell to write down the formula. So far, so good: the first two “clicks” are impotent, but the game is interrupted by a fight. When Josephson inadvertently retrieves the dropped gun, Stillwell reminds him that he, now, has the power, control of the situation. “If you’re not committed to anything,” Stillwell says, “you’re just taking up space,” and convinces him to call the police. Stillwell and Shela embrace on the balcony as the police work in the background. Fade out.

mirage 1965 5For the sake of economy in that synopsis, many of the examples of Stillwell’s amnesia were deleted, as were some of the encounters with his adversaries, including a chase through New York City’s Central Park. Removed, too, were at least two love scenes and that tender interlude of the “tea” party referred to earlier, all which some will see as unnecessary digressions from the mystery. That long scene of dénouement with “the Major” is a bit protracted, however well crafted the suspense and the cascading revelations.

The plot of Mirage is complicated, and for most of the time the audience may be as confused as Stillwell. Maybe that’s the intent of the film, for viewer and actor, both, to discover what’s happening. In any case, Mirage should be seen several times to be fully appreciated.

The numerous memory flashbacks—two men under a tree, a man falling, memory-jogging lines from previous scenes—must have been a nightmare in a different way for film editor Ted J. Kent—The Bride of Frankenstein, My Man Godfrey (1936), The Wolf Man. Cinematography is by Joseph MacDonald, whose own credits include My Darling Clementine, The Young Lions, The Sand Pebbles and The List of Adrian Messenger, a sentimental favorite of this writer.

For Quincy Jones, who had scored The Pawnbroker the year before, the music is only sometimes noticeable, the perfect illustration, for those who believe such, that a good score is an unnoticed score. Even when the music is forward enough to become a true part of the movie, it is not always suspense-appropriate or otherwise effective. Jones would also score the weak, even more confusing remake of Mirage in 1968. In Jigsaw, with Bradford Dillman in the Peck role, the score does little to help the already script-muddled film.

Finally—and a welcomed contrast to what is, after all, a very dark film—the exchanges between Peck and Matthau are the best, most humorous parts of the film. Simply put, Matthau steals the show, hands down. The most sprightly repartee occurs during Caselle’s first visit to Stillwell’s apartment, illustrated in this excerpt from their dialogue, beginning with the detective:

“I’ll tell you one thing, it’s kind of scary.”

“You don’t even talk like a detective.”

“ . . . What if someone wants you playing this thing all alone, without any help? What if I’m supposed to write you off as a nut and walk away?”

“What if I am a nut?”

“I don’t think you’re nuts enough to imagine that big fellow that’s been following us since we left the bank.”

“I didn’t see any one.”

“You’re not being paid to.”

“Wouldn’t it be hilarious if you did know what you’re doing?”

“Then how come I don’t know what to do next?”

“Pretend you’re James Bond. He always knows what to do.”

{ 1 comment }